ICU Management & Practice, Volume 17 - Issue 2, 2017

img PRINT OPTIMISED

The treatment of cardiac arrest has made significant progress over the last 10–15 years. This period marks a significant turning point, because the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) had often been considered an exercise in futility, with no improvement in outcome for the previous 30 years (Berdowski et al. 2010). In recent years, several investigators have documented marked improvements in survival after OHCA, particularly in those cases with an initial shockable rhythm (ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) (Wissenberg et al. 2013; Daya et al. 2015; Chan et al. 2014).

 

Several interventions are likely responsible for the improving survival rates following OHCA. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with survival rates that are 2–3 times higher than those cases without bystander CPR (Hasselqvist-Ax et al. 2015; Rajan et al. 2016). Emergency medical services dispatchers are now better trained to efficiently ask the right questions to enable prompt recognition of cardiac arrest and then to instruct the caller to perform compressiononly CPR (telephone CPR) (Bobrow et al. 2016). For shockable rhythms, reducing the delay to attempted defibrillation also improves outcome. Implementation of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs and dispatch of community first responders trained to use automated external defibrillators (AEDs) will reduce the time to defibrillation (Blom et al. 2014). Text alerts can be used to direct first responders to retrieve the nearest AED and then take it to the scene of a cardiac arrest (Zijlstra et al. 2014).

 

Once return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) has been achieved, post-resuscitation management impacts significantly on the ultimate neurological outcome. European guidelines for the management of postcardiac arrest patients were published in 2015 and describe the interventions that will optimise outcome (Nolan et al. 2015). Those patients who achieve ROSC and have ST-elevation (STE) on their ECG will require urgent coronary catheterisation because most of these will benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to restore coronary perfusion (Dumas et al. 2010). The immediate management of those without an obvious non-cardiac cause and without STE is controversial. Some experts advocate urgent coronary catheterisation in all such patients (Dumas et al. 2016). Current European guidance is that these patients should also be discussed with interventional cardiologists and considered for urgent coronary catheterisation (Nolan et al. 2015). Some centres will immediately catheterise cardiac arrest survivors without STE, but only if they had presented with a shockable rhythm.

 
See Also:
 Chain of Survival after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest


Cerebral autoregulation is disturbed in 35% of post-cardiac arrest patients and is particularly associated with pre-arrest hypertension (Ameloot et al. 2015a). The optimal target mean arterial pressure (MAP) post cardiac arrest is likely to vary between patients, but to avoid secondary brain ischaemia it has been suggested that the optimal MAP is likely to be in the range 85–105 mmHg, which is somewhat higher than the 65–70 mmHg that is widely used (Ameloot et al. 2015b).

 

Until recently, in the immediate period after ROSC (certainly prehospital and often in the emergency department) it has been common practice to ventilate the lungs of comatose post-cardiac arrest patients with 100% oxygen. This not unreasonably reflected concerns about harm from hypoxaemia and lack of awareness of harm from highconcentration oxygen. Animal studies have documented worse neurological outcome from the use of 100% oxygen immediately after ROSC, particularly during the first hour (Balan et al. 2006), and some observational studies using data from intensive care unit (ICU) registries have documented an association between hyperoxaemia and worse outcome among post-cardiac arrest patients. In a randomised controlled trial (RCT) the use of routine supplemental oxygen among patients with STE myocardial infarction (but not cardiac arrest), resulted in an increase in size of myocardial infarction compared with patients given oxygen only if hypoxaemic (Stub et al. 2015). A RCT of oxygen titrated to 90–94% versus 98–100% as soon as possible after ROSC and continued until ICU admission (EXACT phase 3 trial) will inform the optimal oxygenation strategy after ROSC (Nolan et al 2017). European guidelines recommend the use of a protective lung ventilation strategy in post-cardiac arrest patients, but this was based mainly on data extrapolated from patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (Nolan et al. 2015). However, a recent observational study of OHCA patients using propensity matching has documented an association between the use of time-weighted average tidal volumes of < 8 mL kg-1 predicted body weight and better neurological outcome (Beitler et al. 2017). Mild hypercapnia may also be associated with better neurological outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients, possibly because it may increase blood flow to ischaemic brain. A phase 2 study comparing mild hypercapnia with normocapnia in 50 postcardiac arrest patients documented a lesser increase in neuron-specific enolase (NSE) values in the hypercapnia group (Eastwood et al. 2016). A RCT comparing post-cardiac arrest patients ventilated to either normocapnia or mild hypercapnia (6.6–7.3 kPa) starts recruiting soon (Targeted Therapeutic Mild Hypercapnia After Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (TAME) [clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03114033]).

 

Mild hypothermia has been shown to improve neurological outcome from OHCA presenting with a shockable rhythm, but the two prospective studies documenting this are now considered to be of moderate to low quality (Bernard et al. 2002; Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Group 2002). The targeted temperature management (TTM) study showed no difference in neurological outcome between all-rhythm OHCA patients with ROSC who had their temperature controlled for 24 h at 33oC versus 36oC (Nielsen et al. 2013). Temperature control for comatose survivors of OHCA is still important, but within the range of 32–34oC there is no consensus on the optimal target temperature (Donnino et al. 2016). The Hypothermia or Normothermia-Targeted Temperature Management After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest-trial (TTM-2 [clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908308]) study will start recruiting soon and will randomise comatose OHCA survivors to temperature control at 33oC versus prevention of fever, with temperature control to a target of 37.5oC initiated only if the patient’s temperature reaches 37.8oC.

 

The commonest mode of death in postcardiac arrest patients who are admitted to ICU but do not survive is withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) following determination of a poor neurological prognosis. We now recognise that in many cases these WLST decisions have been premature and that prognostic tests previously thought to be reliable are associated with unacceptably high false positive rates (Elmer et al. 2014; Cronberg et al. 2017). European guidelines for prognostication in comatose post-cardiac arrest patients advocate a multimodal approach that is delayed until at least 3 days after cardiac arrest (Sandroni et al. 2014). Those ICUs experienced in the management of post-cardiac arrest patients should have easy access to electroencephalography, including somatosensory evoked potentials, and to neurologists who can interpret the findings.

 

In some countries, regionalisation of postcardiac arrest treatment has resulted in cardiac arrest centres with availability of 24/7 coronary catheterisation laboratories, intensive care teams experienced in post-resuscitation care and neurologists that can help in the interpretation of neuroprognostic tests (Spaite et al. 2014). The introduction of cardiac arrest centres where high volumes of post-cardiac arrest patients can be treated is associated with better outcomes, even when patients are transported for greater distances as they bypass local hospitals (Tranberg et al. 2017; Schober et al. 2016; Elmer et al. 2016). Investigators in London, UK are about to start recruiting to a study patients with ROSC after OHCA of likely cardiac cause but without STE on their 12-lead ECG, and will compare the outcome of patients randomised to be transported to the nearest acute hospital with those taken to a regional cardiac arrest centre (Patterson et al. 2017). This study will help to determine if all OHCAs of cardiac cause should be treated in a cardiac arrest centres and not just those patients with STE on their 12-lead ECG.

 

By strengthening every link in the chain of survival it is likely that survival from cardiac arrest can still be improved considerably.

 

Conflict of Interest

 

Jerry Nolan is Editor-in-Chief of Resuscitation. He has a UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) grant for the PARAMEDIC-2 study (adrenaline versus placebo in out of hospital cardiac arrest-OHCA) and for the AIRWAYS-2 study (i-gel versus tracheal intubation in OHCA).

 

Abbreviations

 

AED automated external defibrillator

ICU intensive care unit

MAP mean arterial pressure

NSE neuron-specific enolase

OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PAD public access defibrillation

PCI percutaneous coronary intervention

pVT pulseless ventricular tachycardia

ROSC return of spontaneous circulation

RCT randomised controlled trial

STE ST-elevation

TTM targeted temperature management

VF ventricular fibrillation

WLST withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy


«« Sherpas Have Superhuman Energy Efficiency


Study: Preventing Ventilator-Associated Events »»

References:

Ameloot K, Genbrugge C, Meex I et al. (2015a) An observational near-infrared spectroscopy study on cerebral autoregulation in post-cardiac arrest patients: Time to drop ‘one-size-fits-all’ hemodynamic targets? Resuscitation, 90: 121-6.

 

Ameloot K, Meex I, Genbrugge C et al. (2015b) Hemodynamic targets during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: A prospectiveobservational study. Resuscitation, 91: 56-62.

 

Balan IS, Fiskum G, Hazelton J et al. (2006) Oximetry-guidedreoxygenation improves neurological outcome after experimental cardiac arrest. Stroke, 37(12):3008-13.

 

Beitler JR, Ghafouri TB, Jinadasa SP, et al. (2017) Favorable neurocognitive outcome with low tidal volume ventilation after cardiac arrest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 195(9): 1198-1206.

 

Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG et al. (2010) Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67prospective studies. Resuscitation, 8(11): 1479-87.

 

Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD et al. (2002) Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med, 346(8): 557-63.

 

Blom MT, Beesems SG, Homma PC, et al. (2014) Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and use of automated external defibrillators. Circulation, 130(21): 1868-75.

 

Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, Vadeboncoeur TF et al. (2016) Implementation of a regional telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation program and outcomesafter out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA Cardiol, 1(3): 294-302.

 

Chan PS, McNally B, Tang F et al. (2014) Recent trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circulation, 130: 1876-82.

 

Cronberg T, Kuiper M (2017) Withdrawal of life sustaining therapy after cardiac arrest. Semin Neurol, 37(1): 81-7.

 

Daya MR, Schmicker RH, Zive DM et al. (2015) Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival improving over time: Results from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). Resuscitation, 91: 108-15.

 

Donnino MW, Andersen LW, Berg KM et al. (2016) Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest: An Advisory Statement by the Advanced Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Resuscitation, 98: 97-104.

 

Dumas F, Bougouin W, Geri G et al. (2016) Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in post-cardiac arrest patients without ST-segment elevation pattern: insights from the PROCAT II registry. JACC Cardiovascular interventions, 9(10): 1011-8.

 

Dumas F, Cariou A, Manzo-Silberman S et al. (2010) Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian Region Outof hospital Cardiac ArresT) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 3(3): 200-7.

 

Eastwood GM, Schneider AG, Suzuki S et al. (2016) Targeted therapeutic mild hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: A phase II multi-centre randomised controlled trial (the CCC trial). Resuscitation, 104:83-90.

 

Elmer J, Rittenberger JC, Coppler PJ et al. (2016) Long-term survival benefit from treatment at a specialty center after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 108: 48-53.

 

Elmer J, Torres C, Aufderheide TP et al. (2016) Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 102: 127-35.

 

Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J et al. (2015) Early cardiopulmonaryresuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med,372(24): 2307-15.

 

Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group (2002) Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. The New England journal of medicine 2002;346:549-56.

 

Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T et al. (2013) Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med, 369(23): 2197-206.

Nolan JP, Soar J, Cariou A et al. (2015) European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for Post-resuscitation Care 2015: Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 95: 202-22.

Nolan JP, Berg RA, Bernard S et al. (2017) Intensive care medicine research agenda on cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med, 11 Mar. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4739-7. [Epub ahead of print]


Patterson T, Perkins GD, Joseph J et al. (2017) A Randomised tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST pilot randomised trial. Resuscitation, 4 Feb. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.01.020. [Epub ahead of print]

Rajan S, Wissenberg M, Folke F et al. (2016) Association of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival according to ambulance response times after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation, 134(25): 2095-104.

Sandroni C, Cariou A, Cavallaro F et al. (2014) Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: an advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Resuscitation, 85(12): 1779-89.


Schober A, Sterz F, Laggner AN, et al. (2016) Admission of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims to a high volume cardiac arrest center is linked to improved outcome. Resuscitation, 106: 42-8.

Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Stolz U et al. (2014) Statewide regionalization of postarrest care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: association with survival and neurologic outcome. Ann Emerg Med, 64(5): 496-506.e1.


Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S et al. (2015) Air versus oxygen in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation, 131(24): 2143-50.

Tranberg T, Lippert FK, Christensen EF et al. (2017) Distance to invasive heart centre, performance of acute coronary angiography, and angioplasty and associated outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide study. Eur Heart J, 29 Mar. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx104. [Epub ahead of print]

Wissenberg M, Lippert FK, Folke F et al.(2013) Association of national initiatives to improve cardiac arrest management with rates of bystander intervention and patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA, 310(13): 1377-84.

Zijlstra JA, Stieglis R, Riedijk F et al. (2014) Local lay rescuers with AEDs, alerted by text messages, contribute to early defibrillation in a Dutch out-of-hospital cardiac arrest dispatch system. Resuscitation, 85(11): 1444-9.